so u think the path is cheaper than the 4runner ?

**** PLEASE USE SUBTOPICS BELOW FOR NEW TOPICS ****

Moderator: volvite

User avatar
guinnessjim
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:58 pm
Location: Newport, OR

Postby guinnessjim » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:19 am

nah....just a troll.

pbby talking out of anger at something, but by his own admission:
ByPath wrote:I didn't have any problems with it YET but it sure felt like it was about to fall apart.
he hadn't had any issues w/ the path (aside from not getting the MPG he expected/wanted and some undefined issues w/ interior trim).


ZSS
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:01 am

Postby ZSS » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:48 am

The 4 Runner is butt ugly.

Shinyboy
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 10:15 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Postby Shinyboy » Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:01 am

Another fantastic thread from ByPath......thanks man, you're a genius!


Return to “2005-2012 Pathfinder (R51)”