The next Pathfinder - a hybrid?

Anything automotive in nature, be it Nissan or one of those "other" manufacturers.

Moderator: volvite

Gray
Posts: 750
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: xxx

The next Pathfinder - a hybrid?

Postby Gray » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:00 pm

From looking through this 2008 PF maintenance brouchure I see three listings for 'Hybrid' control, battery and brake systems. Damn I hope Nissan turfs that whole PF hybrid idea and gives North America a simple fuel efficient diesel engine PF as has been made available throughout the rest of the world.

.


User avatar
geoffstgermaine
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:17 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Postby geoffstgermaine » Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:17 am

I've heard that part of the problem with diesel vehicles in NA is the particular emissions standards here. I'm not sure that it's true, but I've heard it. It is a shame though as when I was growing up my dad had a diesel truck and he loved it. I almost bought a much older PF with the diesel engine before I bought the 06 I have now.

User avatar
NVSteve
Sponsored Member
Posts: 1987
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:27 am
Location: Salt Lake City

Postby NVSteve » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:03 am

geoffstgermaine wrote:I've heard that part of the problem with diesel vehicles in NA is the particular emissions standards here. I'm not sure that it's true, but I've heard it. It is a shame though as when I was growing up my dad had a diesel truck and he loved it. I almost bought a much older PF with the diesel engine before I bought the 06 I have now.
I don't remember the specifics, but something recently changed that will allow the US to have many more diesels on the roads in the near future. Sure, there have always been a handful of diesel cars out there, but they haven't been legal in all 50 states. Here's a good site for diesel news:

http://mydrive.roadfly.com/blog/ExJxZ3/

User avatar
RacerZX
Site Admin
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Postby RacerZX » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:29 am

Diesel engines burn very very lean and hot, which makes lots of NOx, and the only reasonable way to reduce the NOx is with a catalytic converter.

The problem though is that US diesel fuel up until this year was high sulfur cheap junk compared to what the European refiners are required to produce, and sulfur destroys Cats.

So at the same time more and more stringent NOx emission rules were taking effect, the refiners were dragging their feet about the new requirement to produce only Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel fuel, and all light duty Diesel engines in the US got squeezed out.

Now ULSD is here, as well as new particle trap technologies, so we're going to be seeing a large increase in the number of passenger diesels in the US over the next few years.

As for a Hybrid Pathfinder, I think that would be a cool option to have. Nissan has always been so way behind in fuel economy it's not even funny, so any progress in that area would be more than welcome.

User avatar
geoffstgermaine
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:17 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Postby geoffstgermaine » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:44 pm

Thanks for the info RacerZX. Interesting to know.

LittleStevie
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 4:32 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

Postby LittleStevie » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:59 am

RacerZX wrote: Nissan has always been so way behind in fuel economy it's not even funny, so any progress in that area would be more than welcome.
Not sure I agree with this, when I was looking at '05s, the Pathfinder posted the best fuel economy numbers out of the Explorer, Trailblazer, Durango, and Grand Cherokee.

User avatar
NVSteve
Sponsored Member
Posts: 1987
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:27 am
Location: Salt Lake City

Postby NVSteve » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:24 am

LittleStevie wrote:
RacerZX wrote: Nissan has always been so way behind in fuel economy it's not even funny, so any progress in that area would be more than welcome.
Not sure I agree with this, when I was looking at '05s, the Pathfinder posted the best fuel economy numbers out of the Explorer, Trailblazer, Durango, and Grand Cherokee.
Maybe Carl was referring to the imports-at least the imports from Asia. I know at least 2 of the vehicles you mentioned are in the top 10 worst SUVs according to many, many comparison sites, surveys, etc. But I would have to agree that the imported 4x4s seem to have better mileage than the home grown variety.

User avatar
RacerZX
Site Admin
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Postby RacerZX » Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:31 am

Whenever I read comparison tests almost any Nissan/Infiniti vehicle comes in poorly in MPG, both compared to other brands and to Nissan's inflated MPG marketing numbers. Comparing to V8 powered american vehicles doesn't count.

HP numbers also used to be vastly over rated, especially compared to the German brands, but that's nicely changed with the latest motors like our VQ40.

User avatar
Fofiddy
Moderator
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 6:40 pm
Location: New England

Postby Fofiddy » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:14 pm

I'm all about deisel. Especially with the availablility of Biodeisel which I'm hearing truckers love. F ethenol, and think about all the waste oil from McDonalds and other rental food retailers that could be used for something more productive than keeping Jenny Craig and the makers of lipitor in buisness. The fuel economy for my path is dismal but livable for as long as gas stays below $4/gal. If it goes any higher I'm moving to the desert and getting a KTM superenduro.

User avatar
RacerZX
Site Admin
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Postby RacerZX » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:17 pm

Amen brother. My daily drive is a '85 VW Diesel in which I burn %100 BioDiesel. Gets around 45MPG, 3 times as good as my Path.


Return to “General Automotive”