Another silly fuel economy post

The Gas and Diesel Engines - VQ40De, VK56DE, YD25DDTi, V9X, Transmission, Transfer Case, Oil, Differentials, Axles, Exhaust...

Moderator: volvite

User avatar
volvite
Sponsored Member
Posts: 2180
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:06 pm
Location: Hill AFB, Utah West Point UT

Postby volvite » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:16 am

That sucks.


User avatar
doctahjones
Posts: 844
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:08 am
Location: aurora, co

Postby doctahjones » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:31 am

NmexMAX wrote: I found, maybe it's due to the diff swap, but my speedo is dead nuts on so I have since stopped adding for the larger tires. Which is bad because well, MPG's aren't so great.

hum, strange since the speed sensors are between the diff and wheel right?

User avatar
disallow
Site Admin
Posts: 2820
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:02 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Postby disallow » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:34 am

At stock size, your speedo reads too slow. So by changing the tire size and gearing, you are probably correcting it.

Check you vehicle speed with GPS to validate, though there is an error factor there as well.

User avatar
doctahjones
Posts: 844
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:08 am
Location: aurora, co

Postby doctahjones » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:44 am

disallow wrote:At stock size, your speedo reads too slow. So by changing the tire size and gearing, you are probably correcting it.

Check you vehicle speed with GPS to validate, though there is an error factor there as well.

in general i would agree with you disallow, but if the speed sensors are between the diff and wheel, changing diff gears shouldn't have an effect on the speedo.

now if the speedo is in the transmission (was i was used to in older cars) then yeah, changing diff/gears for sure will 'level out' the speedo (and reported mpg)

User avatar
NmexMAX
Posts: 796
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:35 pm
Location: Northern New Mexico

Postby NmexMAX » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:50 am

That's right, they're on the hubs/axle shafts.

My tires are 33.1" Using GPS and also for giggles those radar readouts the cops put out both verify with the dash speed.
doctahjones wrote:
disallow wrote:At stock size, your speedo reads too slow. So by changing the tire size and gearing, you are probably correcting it.

Check you vehicle speed with GPS to validate, though there is an error factor there as well.

in general i would agree with you disallow, but if the speed sensors are between the diff and wheel, changing diff gears shouldn't have an effect on the speedo.

now if the speedo is in the transmission (was i was used to in older cars) then yeah, changing diff/gears for sure will 'level out' the speedo (and reported mpg)

User avatar
disallow
Site Admin
Posts: 2820
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:02 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Postby disallow » Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:33 am

doctahjones wrote:in general i would agree with you disallow, but if the speed sensors are between the diff and wheel, changing diff gears shouldn't have an effect on the speedo.

now if the speedo is in the transmission (was i was used to in older cars) then yeah, changing diff/gears for sure will 'level out' the speedo (and reported mpg)
Yep didn't know about the sensor location, that makes total sense.

But the tire size is for sure a factor. When I ran 265/75/16s, my GPS speed and speedo speed were an exact match. Now that I have 265/70/16s they are not, and are about 3-5% off.

Makes a big difference when calculating fuel economy... What are the real numbers dammit?!?!? :)

User avatar
leadpig
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:27 pm
Location: Mississippi

Postby leadpig » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:09 am

disallow wrote:At stock size, your speedo reads too slow. So by changing the tire size and gearing, you are probably correcting it.

Check you vehicle speed with GPS to validate, though there is an error factor there as well.
Mine's the opposite. 75 on the speedo is 71-72 by GPS, which if I'm thinking right means I'm not going as far as the odometer says, so my fuel economy is worse than it is already. And I've only done 15800 miles instead of 16500 and so my warranty will run out sooner than it should!

Or are the miles and the speed measured separately?

User avatar
disallow
Site Admin
Posts: 2820
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:02 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Postby disallow » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:11 am

When I have taken the time to check, there seems to be a directly linear relationship to distance travelled vs how fast the vehicle thinks it is going.

I would have that checked!

t

User avatar
leadpig
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:27 pm
Location: Mississippi

Postby leadpig » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:09 am

disallow wrote:When I have taken the time to check, there seems to be a directly linear relationship to distance travelled vs how fast the vehicle thinks it is going.

I would have that checked!

t
Well, in a bit of procrastination-driven googling, it seems that in US an acceptable inaccuracy is up to 5 % (I'm at 4), as long as it is over. Reading slower seems a universal no-no, so manufacturers generally set vehicles up to overestimate a bit. GPS also has its wobbles, but is generally closer to 1%. Of course all that came off the interweb, so who knows...

User avatar
FLiPMaRC
Posts: 477
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:15 pm
Location: NJ

Postby FLiPMaRC » Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:46 pm

FLpathFinder wrote:According to the gauge under the speedo, 350 honest!
skinny2 wrote:My gauge and DTE display are pretty accurate as well. The DTE is conservative by a factor of a couple gallons but that's quite normal. My wife's Acura is far more conservative on the miles to empty.

I've been getting in the 19mpg range lately. Today I have 309 miles on this tank and DTE is showing 45 miles to go. I'll fill up when I get back home which will put me at 335 miles and I'll pump 17-18 gallons.

I've gone 40 additional miles AFTER the DTE hit's zero (or **) and still had a gallon in the tank.

So for the sake of argument....what's your actual mpg if you divide miles driven by gallons pumped?

Welp I just did a 1,500 mile road trip to Ontario, Canada last week. It was my first real road trip with the Pathy. The DTE just kept going up and up every time I filled up. 384 was the highest :lol: It really likes the highway driving. I was running 70-75mph most of the time.

Image


Screen shot of my Mileage history App on my phone. I tried my best to convert from Canadian dollar to US dollar and from Liters to US gallon (3.78 liters NOT imperial gallons).
Image



And this one was a fluke I think. I was on a stretch of road where I was running only 50mph for a good 45mins.
Image

semaj
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:16 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Postby semaj » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:18 am

disallow wrote:For instance, today with DTE showing 29kms and my gas gauge right at the bottom, I filled up. The truck took 64L. It has an 80L tank. But the gauge showed it was right empty. (traveled 430km on that much fuel, which equates to 14.8L/100km or 15.8MPG)
I came here looking to see if this was normal :lol:

My gauge was nearly on E, DTE says 30km, filled up and it only took 64L too! But my mileage seems correct as well. I guess I will stop worrying.

On a recent road trip to Portland, OR I was getting great mileage and the DTE got as high as 572km

User avatar
doctahjones
Posts: 844
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:08 am
Location: aurora, co

Postby doctahjones » Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:18 pm

FLiPMaRC wrote: And this one was a fluke I think. I was on a stretch of road where I was running only 50mph for a good 45mins.
Image

going downhill with a tailwind right? 8)

i can get briefly get similar numbers if i fill up in a mountain town and coast back down to denver.

User avatar
FLiPMaRC
Posts: 477
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:15 pm
Location: NJ

Postby FLiPMaRC » Mon Jul 01, 2013 7:12 am

I would be happy with just a constant 20mpg. :lol:

Now that I'm back home and on my normal mixed city & highway driving, I'm getting my normal 17-18mpg. :?

CPLTECH
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:30 am
Location: SW Ohio

Postby CPLTECH » Mon Jul 01, 2013 1:10 pm

I grew up thinking that I could get better mileage by not using cruise. However, by using the ScanGauge2 & monitoring “instant MPG” I am finding that cruise is a good thing since the gas pedal on the PF is so touchy. So other than not using it going up hills, I am using cruise a lot more.

DanJetta
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:47 am

Postby DanJetta » Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:56 am

Image

Wanted to see how high I could get it. I think this is the top.


Return to “R51 Engine, Driveline and Powertrain”