285 vs 265 vs MPG

Anything relating to Wheels, Tires, and Brake options and upgrades...

Moderator: volvite

mark439
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:08 pm

285 vs 265 vs MPG

Postby mark439 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:15 pm

Hello everyone. I am very close to purchasing a new Pathfinder this weekend. I have been reading the posts and would like to install a 2 " lift as soon I get the car. I'm debating if I want to go 285/75/16 or 265/75/16. I have decided on General Grabber AT 2's. Does the 1" larger tire really make that big of an impact on mileage? They do seem to fill out the wheel well better..... thanks in advance!


User avatar
disallow
Site Admin
Posts: 2820
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:02 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Postby disallow » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:48 pm

My experience says it makes a big difference. I went from 265/70 to 265/75. It was about 10% difference in fuel economy.

You could actually feel the engine working harder, when I switched back, the truck would creep forward at idle again. With the big tires it would not.

yellowbug
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:24 pm

Postby yellowbug » Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:58 pm

I went from 32's to 33's on my x and lost about 2.5 mpgs

staynlean
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:28 pm
Location: Memphis Tennessee

Postby staynlean » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:00 pm

yellowbug wrote:I went from 32's to 33's on my x and lost about 2.5 mpgs
Ugh, I don't want to hear this. Trying to make this decision my self currently over 265 or 285. Why does gas have to be such an issue.

Leaning toward the smaller tire as of right now.

User avatar
NmexMAX
Posts: 796
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:35 pm
Location: Northern New Mexico

Postby NmexMAX » Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:48 am

Kind of a double whammy since you're also adding 20mm of width.

I've got a commuter vehicle so to speak, so I really didn't buy the Pathy for MPG's, but I would stay smaller if in fact it is your DD.

Shouldn't look that bad even with 2" of lift and finding a happy medium in tire size.

These in the picture are 31.5" w/ 2.5" lift, which is right about where the 265/75-16's you were thinking of. Although the pictured are 18's, overall dia. is the same


Image

User avatar
RacerZX
Site Admin
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Postby RacerZX » Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:19 am

So...it's bad, but not necessarily as bad as it seems.

Yes, the taller tire raises the body increasing frontal area and aerodynamic drag, and a wider tire both increases drag from road friction AND increases the frontal area.

But, it's not all bad. A taller tire also increases the tire's circumference, which makes the engine's gearing taller, slowing your acceleration and giving you lower engine RPMs at the same speed which is a good thing for MPG.

However, you never really see that benefit unless you do careful math and testing, because now both your speedometer and odometer are wrong. What was 69MPH is maybe now 73MPH, and what was 1 mile is now 1.07 miles. That means your truck is doing more real work by going faster and further than your MPG display is telling you.

I had fun testing this one out after putting the big 285s on my truck. Doing before and after testing, using GPS to make sure I was driving at the same real speed, and to correct the odometer distance, I found that after the upgrade my real MPG was about 10% higher than the computer. So 15MPG is really 16.5MPG.

Food for thought...and as always, YMMV :wink:


Return to “R51 Brakes, Tires, and Wheels”