Moderator: volvite
Yes, it seems the tire is catching on a tab sticking out from the mudflap.bbermann wrote: Did you say you are getting rub with these?
I don't agree on the dry, I found they were pretty squirrelly on dry pavement, mostly due to the torque available from the pathy... In snow they seemed OK, but the ABLS kicked in alot. Overall, I was not impressed with these tires at all.skinny2 wrote:The Cooper ATR's handled a little better on dry but weren't quite as good in the snow.
I just priced out Coopers before I went to Costco for the REV02s, they were actually more expensive! $215 plus installation, whereas I got the REV02s for $205 plus install, and I get a $75 rebate in-store.skinny2 wrote:Difference being the Revo's were $900 and the Coopers were $600.
The quick calculation for diameter difference:skinny2 wrote:Yes, heavier tire and more aggressive tread = extra rolling resistance. It's surprising how much that effects performance. How much larger diameter are we talking? Have you ever tried chalking the tires to get the psi just right?
I missed the part where you were upsizing. IIRC, the Revo's were a bit taller than most other same size tires as well so you may be getting rub that others with a 70 series don't get. The first set of Coopers I went to were the 265/70 and the 2nd set I went back to the 265/65. When I switched back to the 65's, I saved about 1mpg. The handling was better on the 65's as well since there was less sidewall. Tire rack usually lists the actual specs for tires (true outside diameter, etc.).disallow wrote:
The quick calculation for diameter difference:
OLD = 265mm x 70% / 25.4 x 2 + 16 = 30.61"
NEW = 265mm x 75% / 25.4 x 2 + 16 = 31.65"
Total diameter difference = 1.04"
The tread is also deeper on the REV02s, so that would need to be added on. I'll try and do an actual measurement today when I get home.
t